
Sean Gallup / Getty Images fo;e
The logo of Swedish automaker Saab.
By Paul A. Eisenstein
With the filing of bankruptcy papers this week it’s all over for Saab but the funeral. Or is it?
Few automakers have existed so long and so close to the precipice -- or shown the uncanny ability to come back from the seeming dead. But this week’s developments would suggest that the Swedish automaker will soon wind up on the automotive rust heap.
The news leaves a lot of folks wondering what will happen next, among them Saab car owners, the maker’s creditors and its employees. There’s relatively little in the kitty left to cover the carmaker’s debts, and a Saab spokesperson today told us warranty service has been “temporarily suspended.”
Even after filing for bankruptcy on Monday, Dutch businessman Victor Muller -- who purchased Saab from General Motors in early 2010 and who has been serving as its chairman -- remained surprisingly optimistic, telling the Dow Jones newswires:
“With a bankruptcy, it is now possible to start with a clean slate.”
Exactly what that means remains to be seen, as the bankrupt firm’s parent, Muller’s Swedish Automobile, or SWAN, said it would write off its investment in the automaker.
There are signs others may see gold amidst the rust, however. The Swedish Ministry of Enterprise says it has received a “number of calls” from potential buyers of Saab’s remaining assets. Among those interested is Zhejiang Youngman Lotus, the ambitious Chinese automaker that had hoped to strike a deal with Saab to head off the Swedish company’s bankruptcy.
It ran into a brick wall in the form of General Motors, which made clear it didn’t want to create a new competitor for its own Chinese operations -- GM being the largest automaker in the booming Asian market. Though it had sold off Saab in 2010, the U.S. company remained one of its biggest suppliers, providing engines and other parts for Saab’s 9-3 and 9-5 models and assembling the new 9-4X crossover vehicle at a GM plant in Mexico.
But Youngman could purchase Saab’s other assets -- if it can figure out precisely what those are. There are the designs for the current Saab models, though it’s unclear what value they would have without GM’s cooperation. There’s also the next-generation Saab 9-3, which was going to migrate to an engine provided by BMW.
There’s also the Saab name itself -- although industry analysts see it as severely tarnished in light of the maker’s long-running death spiral. And a purchaser might still have to get approval to use the brand name from Swedish defense company Saab AB, which sold the automaker to GM a decade ago.
Saab started out as an aircraft manufacturer, originally known as Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget. A group of the company’s engineers, looking for ways to keep busy as defense spending collapsed, put together the company’s first automobile shortly after World War II.
Saab never developed a solid financial foundation. GM bought a 50 percent stake in 1989, acquiring the rest of the company 11 years later. GM decided it close or sell off Saab -- along with three other North American brands -- after emerging from bankruptcy in 2009.
Saab was set to close when Muller stepped in later that year. The deal was completed early in 2010 and gave Muller, among other things, Saab’s headquarters and assembly plant in Trollhattan, Sweden.
The Swedish carmaker earlier this year had raised some preliminary cash by selling its factory and other properties. What use they will be to anyone remains unclear. While the Saab assembly plant was one of GM’s most modern it is located far from the center of European automotive manufacturing and in a country with some of the Continent’s highest labor costs.
Part of the challenge for anyone interested in purchasing Saab assets is that it would also have to deal with both the Swedish government and the European Investment Bank, the latter having provided a 400 million euro loan to back the sale of Saab last year to what was then known as Spyker Cars.
The Swedish courts have already appointed two trustees to try to rescue whatever is possible from the ruins of Saab. Muller hinted he would like to see workers -- who have gone unpaid for months -- get something in time for the holidays, though that seems unlikely.
Despite its problems, Saab has maintained a small core of loyalists; U.S. sales totaled almost 4,000 units this year. The question is what will happen to those and previous buyers. Vehicles sold when GM owned the company should qualify for warranty service at GM dealers, according to several industry sources, but there could be hiccups in the short-term, and as for vehicles -- like the new 9-4X -- purchased after the sale, that could be another matter entirely.
But for the moment, the news is bad for all Saab owners. Saab USA spokesperson Michele Tinson noted that, “all warranty coverage is now being suspended until we have further direction from the [bankruptcy] trustees.”
Even those older GM-built models are facing delays. Should a customer have an immediate problem, Tinson said, it will be “up to the discretion of the dealer” to decide whether to provide covered repairs or charge the owner.
Related:


With the filing of bankruptcy papers this week it's all over for Saab but the funeral. Or is it? YES IT IS. Strange design cars and weird owners. Rest In Peace.
I drove a 900 for years until my family outgrew it. It was a great car: fuel efficient, roomy (I'm 6'5"), safe, and fun to drive. I bought it in Alaska and it got around great. I was hoping to get another when the kids got older. Too bad. I hope they can somehow pull out of the hole GM left them in.
right on ren...the car and drivers did look peculiar...sort of like commie spies from the mid 50's
yes yes ren! we are verrrry weird, and suspicious looking. Perhaps a censor as you could help identify us all-alas, the company is going under, thanks to none other than the all American GM. Problem solved, no more differences, lets all drive the same cars, behave the same and heck-why not! lets dress the same too!
Is this the start for the economical WAR between the US and Europe ???
yes LM, the airline carbon tax etc... when things go well we hear talks about "increasing pie" from synergy etc. when things go bad, it's the "fixed pie theory". Sad, only good thing about it is simplicity of management, and being that companies run on reduced staff, it helps.
When things go bad there's always a war, with or without guns. I still think without guns is better.
A Saab sob story. Couldn't resist the pun. Used to sell these things. Most were unreliable, strange looking things. Had a lot of owner complaints but they would come back and buy another. Go figure.
the general likes to kill off competitors so they can sell more of there junk...................RIP dear SAAB
is this just another saab story?
if this is really the end i think i will saab at the funeral, like everyone else.
GM couldn't run a company or make a decent product if their God-forsaken lives depended on it.
What they did to SAAB reminds me why I would NEVER buy so much as a can of soda from those clowns.
Everything De-Generate Motors touches turns to sh1t. Everything. And my money is being used to bail out these imbeciles?
Why couldn't SAAB be bailed out instead?????
I wish it ended just the other way around, SAAB remained afloat, and
GeneralGovernment Motors went down.Quit hanging onto the past, by 2020, gas will be 5.00, 20% of vehicles on the road will be hybrid or electric and coal energy will be a footnote, nuclear will gain more ground and alternative energy will grow. In 50 years there will be no more gas cars, maybe 75 years. Start changing your mindset now.
I put a very,very old Viking curse on GM.